Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta
Date: 2010-05-02 03:40:09
Message-ID: AANLkTimNHgymSX8itow6w1GTs2BNatLPhcu_l9-n-7qt@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> To the extent that future bug fixes are relevant to multiple versions
> of pg_migrator, we could just apply them to multiple branches, same as
> we manage such fixes for the core code.  I don't see that trying to
> have a single version of pg_migrator is going to make things easier
> anywhere.

That might be OK if by "multiple versions" we mean "multiple branches
within the repository". But I'm not so sure about having a version in
the core repository and another version on pgfoundry, or something of
that sort.

...Robert

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-05-02 03:52:52 Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-02 03:38:06 Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta