Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Date: 2010-10-08 06:52:16
Message-ID: AANLkTimLayAEnqvKscugKmiSBEyE5T3Td63N5BSZ6Y=_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yes, let's please just implement something simple and get it
> committed.  k = 1.  Two GUCs (synchronous_standbys = name, name, name
> and synchronous_waitfor = none|recv|fsync|apply)

For my cases, I'm OK with this as the first commit, for now.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-10-08 07:02:50 Re: proposal: plpgsql, solution for derivated types of parameters
Previous Message Vincenzo Romano 2010-10-08 06:34:18 Re: On Scalability