Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vaibhav Kaushal <vaibhavkaushal123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE?
Date: 2010-11-20 19:03:50
Message-ID: AANLkTim0HKLHLL93ADMi0HC8s8OChZnyX+78saijXoBZ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Vaibhav Kaushal
<vaibhavkaushal123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the answer. I see a lot of people discussing so many things
> so I thought my email would have been ignored by those with a lot coming in
> already. Thanks for the enlightenment.

Sure. Just FYI, with these kinds of things, I do try to keep track of
them because I like to try to make sure that everyone gets an answer
back. But, I don't always have time to do it immediately, and
sometimes I wait even if I do, if I think that someone more
knowledgeable on that particular topic might chime in.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-20 19:05:33 Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Previous Message Vaibhav Kaushal 2010-11-20 18:59:32 Re: Fwd: What do these terms mean in the SOURCE CODE?