Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: timestamp of the last replayed transaction
Date: 2010-11-10 03:57:26
Message-ID: AANLkTim=pPe8F7HHjtevU5Wngk5nQKpBqDUqQNLcWqJ2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 11/9/10 5:44 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>> But, pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp is more intuitive for many people?
>>> If so, let's change
>>> the name.
>>
>> *None* of these names are intuitive.  So let's just go for consistency.
>
> OK. I changed the name to pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-11-10 04:04:57 We need index-only scans
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-10 03:31:39 Re: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal