| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SR slaves and .pgpass |
| Date: | 2010-06-14 02:56:15 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTil2u_iNKoSJ08BIAY1rewO_OdHjHM2QzVoMeEpb@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 09/06/10 08:24, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
>>> "localhost" is used.
>>
>> OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
>> field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.
>
> Thanks, committed with some rewording of the docs and comments. I hope I
> made them better, not worse.
I could confirm that this has been committed via git log, but not find
the related post on the pgsql-committers. Is there a problem in the
mailing-list?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-14 03:08:13 | visibility map |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-14 00:35:08 | pg_dump(all) --quote-all-identifiers |