| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | aaliya zarrin <aaliya(dot)zarrin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: To Signal The postmaster |
| Date: | 2010-12-08 03:47:43 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikvn1HffsroUVKeR8J=6D7oxgYJWcTsi7JyDeWj@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:22 PM, aaliya zarrin <aaliya(dot)zarrin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Is this provision already there in the code?
> There ate already SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are handled in the postmaster? is it
> for the same?
SIGUSR1 is already used. SIGUSR2 is actually unused, but reserved for children
according to the source code comment.
Though I've been thinking about this topic, a good idea doesn't occur to me yet.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg00929.php
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2010-12-08 04:38:02 | Re: directory archive format for pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-08 03:44:47 | Re: Review: Extensions Patch |