| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How to share the result data of separated plan |
| Date: | 2010-11-08 19:59:48 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTiknHEZXG4kjHgH4ZE2gqUJzJnWxpR_m8Bngefwq@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> You've now vetoed both "using the same snapshot" and "using different
>> snapshots" at different points in time.
>
> Yeah, I did change my mind between 2009-10 and 2010-02. I was not aware
> that I'm not allowed to change my mind ...
I didn't mean to say that you aren't, just that it's hard to hit a
moving target. As far as I was aware until yesterday, your 2009-10
opinion was still the most current one. Your email also gave the
(perhaps incorrect) impression that you didn't remember the previous
conversations on this topic.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-11-08 20:00:34 | Re: proposal: plpgsql - iteration over fields of rec or row variable |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-08 19:56:31 | Re: UNION ALL has higher cost than inheritance |