Re: ToDo: enhanced diagnostic for plpgsql

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ToDo: enhanced diagnostic for plpgsql
Date: 2010-11-26 20:46:36
Message-ID: AANLkTikjtE0L11kj8bhb_qdvZjA2itCWLoYjs1mooXEt@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2010/11/26 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of vie nov 26 07:37:42 -0300 2010:
>> Hello
>>
>> there is difficult working with exception still. Isn't time to move forward?
>>
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-11/msg01129.php
>>
>> I am thinking, so we can little bit enhance a GET DIAGNOSTICS statement
>>
>> condition item names are defined in SQL 92 - mainly: TABLE_NAME,
>> COLUM_NAME and MESSAGE_TEXT.
>
> This is probably connected to my proposal here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20090804171210.GL6494@alvh.no-ip.org
>

yes, your proposal means first step

Pavel

> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-11-26 21:52:09 Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-11-26 20:43:50 Re: ToDo: enhanced diagnostic for plpgsql