Re: SSI and Hot Standby

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSI and Hot Standby
Date: 2011-01-20 01:59:23
Message-ID: AANLkTikYvkPaYhPNW4YQHGd6jfyzERjd4LLwH_0RHQBF@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> I agree it's pretty late in the cycle, but I'm going through all the
> loose ends and found this one -- which has been hanging out on the
> Wiki page as an R&D item for over a full year without discussion.
> :-(  If we provide the snapshots (which we can safely and easily
> do), can someone else who knows what they're doing with WAL and HS
> get the rest of it safely into the release?  That seems to me to be
> the only way it can still happen for 9.1.

I think it's way too late to be embarking on what will probably turn
out to be a reasonably complex and possibly controversial new
development arc. I don't have a strong position on what we should do
instead, but let's NOT do that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-20 02:01:48 Re: ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE WITH
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2011-01-20 01:58:49 Re: REVIEW: WIP: plpgsql - foreach in