From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dan Ports <drkp(at)csail(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |
Date: | 2011-01-20 01:59:23 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikYvkPaYhPNW4YQHGd6jfyzERjd4LLwH_0RHQBF@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> I agree it's pretty late in the cycle, but I'm going through all the
> loose ends and found this one -- which has been hanging out on the
> Wiki page as an R&D item for over a full year without discussion.
> :-( If we provide the snapshots (which we can safely and easily
> do), can someone else who knows what they're doing with WAL and HS
> get the rest of it safely into the release? That seems to me to be
> the only way it can still happen for 9.1.
I think it's way too late to be embarking on what will probably turn
out to be a reasonably complex and possibly controversial new
development arc. I don't have a strong position on what we should do
instead, but let's NOT do that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-20 02:01:48 | Re: ALTER TABLE ... REPLACE WITH |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2011-01-20 01:58:49 | Re: REVIEW: WIP: plpgsql - foreach in |