Re: performance sol10 zone (fup)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Heiko L(dot)" <heikol(at)fh-lausitz(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: performance sol10 zone (fup)
Date: 2010-08-12 03:16:54
Message-ID: AANLkTikWPuctJOyqCpcrttsSUoqefC5NHHPEZH6qXLGK@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Heiko L. <heikol(at)fh-lausitz(dot)de> wrote:
> $ echo "EXPLAIN ANALYSE $sql2" | $cmd 2>&1
>  Aggregate  (cost=5236.53..5236.54 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=2018.985..2018.9
> 86 rows=1 loops=1)
>   ->  Seq Scan on blacklist  (cost=0.00..4855.06 rows=152588 width=0) (actual t
> ime=0.329..1883.275 rows=152603 loops=1)
>         Filter: (create_time < ((((timenow())::integer - 3000))::abstime)::time
> stamp with time zone)
>  Total runtime: 2019.371 ms

Maybe you need an index on create_time.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-08-12 04:12:08 Re: performance sol10 zone (fup)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-08-12 02:39:40 Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem