Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Terry Laurenzo <tj(at)laurenzo(dot)org>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP)
Date: 2010-11-21 13:11:18
Message-ID: AANLkTikUiG5qk9ZVh6Mnh0b8CwKfzQkjHuSd=i=zVc_8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Terry Laurenzo <tj(at)laurenzo(dot)org> wrote:
> What we see from this is that parsing JSON text and generating a binary
> representation is cheap, representing approximately 10% of the base case
> time.  Conversely, anything that involves generating JSON text is expensive,
> accounting for 30-40% of the base case time.  Some incidental profiling
> shows that while the entire operation is expensive, the process of
> generating string literals dominates this time.  There is likely room for
> optimization in this method, but it should be noted that most of these
> documents are lightly escaped (if escaped at all) which represents the happy
> path through the string literal output function.

Ouch! That's kind of painful. But certainly for some use cases it
will work out to a huge speedup, if you're doing subscripting or
similar.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-11-21 13:18:10 Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-21 12:53:57 Re: ALTER OBJECT any_name SET SCHEMA name