Re: Sync Rep v19

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep v19
Date: 2011-03-05 12:24:46
Message-ID: AANLkTikU8bBEb+k4GBKxhrqJYtHJ_bLHYZepgTrSyVaw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> It is documented that the selection of standby from a set of similar
> priorities is indeterminate. Users don't like it, they can change it.

That doesn't seem like a good argument to *change* the synchronous
standby once it's already set.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2011-03-05 12:49:46 Re: Sync Rep v19
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2011-03-05 12:21:26 Re: Sync Rep v19