| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |
| Date: | 2011-01-18 17:55:47 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikSLDeeMVGF1_Duf-UsP7yErjSFD1BR4RfauEFF@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> So it'd be pg_receive_wal and pg_receive_base_backup then? Votes from
> others? (it's easy to rename so far, so I'll keep plugging away under
> the name pg_basebackup based on Fujii-sans comments until such a time
> as we have a reasonable consensus :-)
I like pg_receive_wal. pg_receive_base_backup I would be inclined to
shorten to pg_basebackup or pg_streambackup, but I just work here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-01-18 18:20:48 | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-18 17:47:36 | Re: estimating # of distinct values |