From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Lukas Eder <lukas(dot)eder(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>, rsmogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function |
Date: | 2011-02-16 11:58:12 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikHdYF407NgX=giNEizY8Z2tcN47xkxuLBO73J=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Lukas Eder <lukas(dot)eder(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not trying to fix the signature. I want exactly that signature. I want
> to return 1 UDT as an OUT parameter from a function.
>
> Somewhere between JDBC and the database, this signature is lost, and JDBC's
> internal code tells me that I have to bind 6 OUT parameters, instead of 1.
> It happens to be so, because the UDT contains 6 attributes, so somehow the
> JDBC/database protocol flattens the UDT, and I think that's a bug, either in
> JDBC or in the protocol or in the database. My findings were that I can
> correctly read the UDT OUT parameter using the pgAdmin III tool, so I
> excluded the database as a bug holder candidate.
Oh, OK. Sorry, I can't help you any with the JDBC side...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2011-02-16 12:03:38 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-02-16 11:26:34 | Re: review: FDW API |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2011-02-16 12:03:38 | Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Weird issues when reading UDT from stored function |
Previous Message | Mike Fowler | 2011-02-16 10:27:47 | Re: JDBC 4 support |