Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, marcin mank <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Date: 2010-12-15 01:26:53
Message-ID: AANLkTik7EW+HFk6+VCjhFkXmURP411fwKoOGJeU0XMbm@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thank you very much for your advice.   Indeed, I'm considering to
> change the license to PostgreSQL's one.   It may take a bit more
> though...

You wouldn't necessarily need to relicense all of Postgres-XC
(although that would be cool, too, at least IMO), just the portion you
were proposing for commit to PostgreSQL. Or it doesn't sound like it
would be infeasible for someone to code this up from scratch. But we
should try to make something good happen here!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-15 01:35:37 Re: Segfault related to pg_authid when running initdb from git master
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2010-12-15 01:25:41 Re: Triggered assertion "!(tp.t_data->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_INVALID)" in heap_delete() on HEAD [PATCH]