Re: archives, attachments, etc (was: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index)

On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the
> > attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a
> > horrid inefficiency. Maybe we could restrict it to text attachments
> > that have a Content-Type with a name attribute that contains the
> > string 'patch', or a similar Content-Disposition filename attribute.
>
> I wish our super admins would have some time to resume the work on the
> new archives infrastructure, that was about ready for integration if not
> prime time:
>
> http://archives.beccati.org/pgsql-hackers/message/276290
>
> As you see it doesn't suffer from this problem, the threading is not
> split arbitrarily, and less obvious but it runs from a PostgreSQL
> database. Yes, that means the threading code is exercising our recursive
> querying facility, as far as I understand it.
>
>
Something looks wrong with that thread. The message text in my mails is
missing. Perhaps that is contained in the .bin files but I can't tell as the
link leads to 404 Not Found.

Regards,
--
gurjeet.singh
@ EnterpriseDB - The Enterprise Postgres Company
http://www.EnterpriseDB.com

singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | yahoo }.com
Twitter/Skype: singh_gurjeet

Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device