Re: Is there a logical reason for 25P02?

From: Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there a logical reason for 25P02?
Date: 2010-10-05 07:43:09
Message-ID: AANLkTik2hz=5xwoFph_udDgGAyVRfBPvg-vOAxQmgJ-k@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

2010/10/5 Konstantin Izmailov <pgfizm(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Let me ask another question related to the INSERT as well. I'm running
> periodic import into Postgres and sometimes the application tries to insert
> a duplicate row which, as expected, results in "integrity violation" error.
> This aborts entire transaction (which is huge). I can use "SAVEPOINT
> ...;INSERT ...;RELEASE SAVEPOINT ..." but I'm concerned with potential
> performance hit. I haven't had time to benchmark the difference in
> performance, so could you please suggest if the difference will be
> noticeable. Is there a better approach? Is it possible to customize INSERT
> behavior to not abort transaction due to an integrity violation? Would it be
> possible to alter COPY command behavior as well (to gracefully continue
> after integrity violation)?

you probably want pgloader : http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/

--
Cédric Villemain               2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sairam Krishnamurthy 2010-10-05 07:49:01 Re: Having two simultaneous and similar database
Previous Message Massa, Harald Armin 2010-10-05 07:33:44 queriing the version of libpq