| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: snapshot generation broken |
| Date: | 2010-09-22 11:45:03 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTik-7g3nKveAV4GYb+cpiCPS8bG1FOtvj9HNr9PK@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:38, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On ons, 2010-09-22 at 13:25 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:20, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> > We need to have a fix for this before we can do any more backbranch
>> > releases.
>>
>> Fix for what, exactly? (assuming that people update their bf animals of course)
>
> For the NLS workflow, we need to have some kind of CVS server that
> serves up all supported branches. Changing the URL or the module name
> or whatever is fine.
I thought you had/were going to convert those to work natively with
git? I guess I misunderstood you.
Anyway, it's on my list to get done pretty quickly.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-09-22 11:47:26 | Re: Multi-branch committing in git, revisited |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-22 11:44:14 | Re: snapshot generation broken |