From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: .gitignore files, take two |
Date: | 2010-09-21 19:01:00 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=y8dMTgf1DJz7Bx2bhFDvyyW6tZ8SR1_GanWzp@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:59, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:21, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>> On tis, 2010-09-21 at 11:27 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> rather than global ignore patterns for *.a and *.so.[0-9]
>>>
>>> Probably rather *.so.[0-9.]+
>
>> Any particular reason not to just do .so.*?
>
> Just paranoia, I guess. I can't actually see a reason why we'd have
> any committable files in the tree matching that pattern. OTOH, we
> probably also need the same type of pattern for .sl and .dylib,
> so at some point a more conservative pattern would be wise.
Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are
they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2010-09-21 19:24:42 | Re: Git conversion status |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-21 18:59:00 | Re: .gitignore files, take two |