Re: Recovery control functions

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recovery control functions
Date: 2011-01-17 06:50:33
Message-ID: AANLkTi=jXHR+Kgyg37kTa8t7WxGdkOKiaVDOmd1W9ngS@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:53, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> So I'm back to my original question which is, how much work would this
>> be? I don't know my way around that part so I can't estimate, and
>> what's there so far is certainly a lot better than nothing, but if
>> it's not a huge amount of work it would be a great improvement.
>
> I don't think it's a huge amount of work. Though I'm not sure
> Simon has time to do that since he would be very busy with
> SyncRep.

True - and I'd certainly want to see him focus on that, as long as
there is any chance we'll get it in there in time.

I'd add it myself, if I only knew that code enough to be sure of what
I was doing ;) But if somebody who does finds some spare time...

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-17 06:52:28 Re: Streaming base backups
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-01-17 06:47:58 Re: replication and pg_hba.conf