Re: git: uh-oh

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 16:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 15:53, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> Michael Haggerty <mhagger(at)alum(dot)mit(dot)edu> writes:
>>>> Somebody could use "git filter-branch" to make this change after the
>>>> conversion, but I can't estimate how much work it would be.
>>>
>>> The conversion is already far better than I expected it would be when
>>> we were first discussing this switch, so my inclination is to just live
>>> with this one wart.
>
>> You're saying you don't "require" a fix on the latest issue here? Or
>> should we spend some time trying to figure out if we can fix it with
>> git-filter-branch?
>
> If you want to try, and it doesn't take much time, go for it.  I was
> just saying I wouldn't complain if we decide to live with it as-is.

Ok. Do we have a way of identifying them - e.g. is it all the commits
with a certain commit msg?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/