Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)
Date: 2010-11-22 14:53:39
Message-ID: AANLkTi=Y2b47wugJOWwpObiYaM0gvhZFu=uKjwtYN4nM@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> However, I am not clear what benefit we get from moving this into core
>> in 9.1.  If it's still going to require a full postmaster restart, the
>> GUC you have to change may as well be shared_preload_libraries as a
>> new one.
>
> +1.  I am not in favor of randomly repackaging functionality, unless
> there's some clear benefit gained by doing so.  In this case it seems
> like something that could and should remain at arm's length forever,
> so a contrib module is the ideal packaging.

Now, if we could make this so low-overhead that it doesn't need a
switch, that would be a good argument for moving it into core, at
least to my way of thinking. But if it's something that needs to be
enabled with a postmaster restart anyway, meh.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-11-22 14:55:48 Re: format() with embedded to_char() formatter
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-22 14:49:17 Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)