| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump |
| Date: | 2010-12-06 15:22:53 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=LpmeivefHLRFS-OXDUzf=HC5VZ4ttZwx3cnK4@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 06.12.2010 15:53, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> I guess. It still seems far too much like exposing the server's guts
>> for my taste. It might not be as bad as the expression tree stuff,
>> but there's nothing particularly good about it either.
>
> Note that we already have txid_current_snapshot() function, which exposes
> all that.
Fair enough, and I think that's actually useful for Slony &c. But I
don't think we should shy away of providing a cleaner API here.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-12-06 15:32:15 | Re: FK's to refer to rows in inheritance child |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-06 15:20:13 | Re: Timeout for asynchronous replication Re: Timeout and wait-forever in sync rep |