| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) |
| Date: | 2010-11-22 15:43:50 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=DGBEP8O2=v0RUOE2Rvmk6+rNZTmRDrD6CRbPB@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:33, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> On mån, 2010-11-22 at 12:37 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Do we want to backpatch it into contrib/?
>
>> It's not a bug fix or an upgrading aid, so no.
>
> I'm less than thrilled about back-patching this, too. It seems to fly
> in the face of all our historical practice.
>
> If you drop the bit about back-patching, then I don't particularly care
> whether it goes into core or contrib for 9.1 --- whichever packaging
> makes the most sense is fine.
My suggestion in the first place was not to backpatch it - I just
wanted to get peoples opinions. I'm perfectly happy if we keep it
somewhere else for the time being - as long as we make the binaries
easily available. But that can go on the wiki for example.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-11-22 15:47:55 | Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-22 15:33:00 | Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files) |