| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option |
| Date: | 2010-07-21 00:27:21 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=C5S0e2V-fj9h3SBVzkurcjdHj1FuWtBh-Shmi@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 6:00 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> What will make everyone happy here?
Nothing.
But on a more serious note, the basic dilemma with this patch is
whether it's useful enough to justify the extra code. I think it's
pretty clearly harmless (modulo the fact that it might have bugs), but
is it useful enough to bother with?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-07-21 00:28:57 | Re: antisocial things you can do in git (but not CVS) |
| Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-07-21 00:15:52 | Re: Patch for 9.1: initdb -C option |