Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Date: 2011-01-23 01:50:50
Message-ID: AANLkTi=7ZVAD+iDm9RTgg-XiZWU47_dBo9Ev6Xvrwf3_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> "Just set" means "use SetConfigOption".
>
> OK.

*reads patch as committed*

This is certainly shorter than I wrote, which is good, but it strikes
me that the fundamental problem here is that the API for an assign
hook is fundamentally different for strings than it is for other data
types.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-01-23 01:55:35 Re: pg_test_fsync problem
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-23 01:50:20 Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers