Re: More detailed auth info

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More detailed auth info
Date: 2011-01-21 15:40:26
Message-ID: AANLkTi=3C5tn+G6ZxT5NKZ_4MH8EFZGAQoG__oNYCedk@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Um, none of the fields I've suggested so far was "connection string".
> In fact, that would be Pretty Darn Hard without modifying the client
> to actually *send* the connection string. Which id doesn't.

So... is there centralized structure which contains the info you're
thinking of exposing?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2011-01-21 15:41:23 Re: sepgsql contrib module
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-21 15:36:12 Re: SSI and Hot Standby