Re: template0 database comment

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: template0 database comment
Date: 2011-03-15 15:33:01
Message-ID: AANLkTi=-gSb-ah2NrVL+chX6xrWtJRXuwX5CL39hDp9M@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 March 2011 15:26, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Applied.  I did not bump the catalog version because they are just
> comments.  I assume that is the right procedure.

*SNIP*

>> +             "COMMENT ON DATABASE postgres IS 'default administrative connection database';\n",

Default administrative connection database? Where's the "connection"
bit come from?

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-15 15:37:22 Re: template0 database comment
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-15 15:26:56 Re: template0 database comment