Re: Git migration timeline

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Git migration timeline
Date: 2010-08-17 09:50:20
Message-ID: AANLkTi==2KgANLW4Gd6mv5ftycGgmMm4+MzFi9h4wzz5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:50:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Better a memory leak than broken ecpg ;-).  Nobody except Michael
>> is terribly comfortable with that code, so we'd all rather wait for
>> him to review and apply the patch.
>
> This patch was small enough that I felt good about it without having a
> chance
> to test it. Anyway, I applied Zoltan's memleak patch to HEAD and 8.4.

What about 9.0?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2010-08-17 11:01:42 Re: PL/pgSQL EXECUTE '..' USING with unknown
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2010-08-17 09:46:04 Re: Git migration timeline