From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Date: | 2007-08-08 19:24:46 |
Message-ID: | A0714320-A542-43A8-8A31-8C195FE15CE4@blighty.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Aug 8, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steve Atkins wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Mike Ellsworth wrote:
>>>
>>> Praise in public, criticize in private.
>>
>> This should be the main take away from this thread.
>>
>>> Particularly when it's 'one of our own'.
>
> There is nothing wrong with public constructive criticism. The problem
> is when people turn it into a war. I have zero problem with public
> criticism of CMD that is kind of the FOSS way.
True. But it would be good if everyone involved remembers that
this is a public forum, and keeps the criticism as professional,
constructive (and ideally, not misquotable out of context) as much
as possible.
Convincing DBAs at an Oracle-only company that PG is a solid,
professionally maintained and supported application is tricky
enough without an impression of public infighting amongst
ourselves.
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-08 19:24:59 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-08 19:18:38 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-08 19:24:59 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-08 19:18:38 | Re: EnterpriseDB Postgres |