Re: outdated (bad) information in pg_stat_activity

From: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Harry Jackson <harryjackson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: outdated (bad) information in pg_stat_activity
Date: 2005-12-17 21:37:19
Message-ID: 9e4684ce0512171337l79a61cefl414261ebc9ec2459@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/17/05, Harry Jackson <harryjackson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 12/17/05, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > must have missed that one. thanks - we are moving to 8.1 anyway
> (50-150%
> > increase in performance for some specific tasks!).
> For which tasks in particular are you seeing this king of gain?
>

so called "imports".
we get data from external source, check it's id number, fetch the same
object from database (if it exists), compare, update changes. if it didn't
exist earlier - insert.
such a procedure "touched" directly 7 tables, and about 20 other using
triggers and other means of automation.

depesz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-17 22:01:15 Re: is this a bug or I am blind?
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-12-17 21:30:04 Re: is this a bug or I am blind?