From: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Harry Jackson <harryjackson(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: outdated (bad) information in pg_stat_activity |
Date: | 2005-12-17 21:37:19 |
Message-ID: | 9e4684ce0512171337l79a61cefl414261ebc9ec2459@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/17/05, Harry Jackson <harryjackson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 12/17/05, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > must have missed that one. thanks - we are moving to 8.1 anyway
> (50-150%
> > increase in performance for some specific tasks!).
> For which tasks in particular are you seeing this king of gain?
>
so called "imports".
we get data from external source, check it's id number, fetch the same
object from database (if it exists), compare, update changes. if it didn't
exist earlier - insert.
such a procedure "touched" directly 7 tables, and about 20 other using
triggers and other means of automation.
depesz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-17 22:01:15 | Re: is this a bug or I am blind? |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-17 21:30:04 | Re: is this a bug or I am blind? |