Re: PG Manual: Clarifying the repeatable read isolation example

From: Evan Jones <ej(at)evanjones(dot)ca>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PG Manual: Clarifying the repeatable read isolation example
Date: 2014-05-27 19:38:35
Message-ID: 9E7DE655-624A-48F6-BC87-89673DEC1E58@evanjones.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Oh yeah, I shared an office with Dan so I should have thought to check their paper. Oops. Thanks for the suggestion; I'll try to summarize this into something that is similar to the Read Committed and Serializable mode examples. It may take me a week or two to find the time, but thanks for the suggestions.

Evan

On May 27, 2014, at 15:32 , Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:

> I agree that's too terse. I think it would be good to actually spell out a complete example of the Receipt problem in the manual. That chapter in the manual contains examples of anomalities in Read Committed mode, so it would be good to give a concrete example of an anomaly in Repeatable Read mode too. Want to write up a docs patch?

--
Work: https://www.mitro.co/ Personal: http://evanjones.ca/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-05-27 19:53:53 json casts
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-05-27 19:36:27 Re: pg_llog not mentioned in "Database File Layout"