From: | "Schwarz, Karl" <Karl(dot)Schwarz(at)ngc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: function performance vs in-line sql |
Date: | 2007-03-08 18:45:09 |
Message-ID: | 9E64800D28DF264DB32B0309B6F222D5188549@xcgny105.northgrum.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Thanks. I was not looking for help with the query just wanted to know
that I didn't overlook some basic
configuration setting.
Karl
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Huxton [mailto:dev(at)archonet(dot)com]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 12:50 PM
To: Schwarz, Karl
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] function performance vs in-line sql
Schwarz, Karl wrote:
> Is there something basic I am missing here with the use of a function.
> I am no database expert, but my assumption was that a function would
> give me better results than in-line sql.
Not necessarily. Usually it means the planner has less information to go
on.
We'll need more information though - table definitions, queries, how is
the function called etc.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron | 2007-03-08 18:59:50 | Re: strange performance regression between 7.4 and 8.1 |
Previous Message | Ron | 2007-03-08 18:40:32 | Re: compact flash disks? |