Re: Python 3.1 support

From: James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Python 3.1 support
Date: 2009-11-20 08:59:56
Message-ID: 9D28E0E6-C0A9-4952-B0CF-AF380659C85B@jwp.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Nov 20, 2009, at 1:26 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> because this is the same execution

Hrm, not necessarily. foo could be imported by another, completely independent part of the program. foo is cached in sys.modules. bar() is executed and it's still the same globals(). shared.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tino Wildenhain 2009-11-20 09:30:05 Re: Python 3.1 support
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2009-11-20 08:34:16 Re: Listen / Notify - what to do when the queue is full