| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. |
| Date: | 2012-05-07 18:44:24 |
| Message-ID: | 9917.1336416264@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 7 May 2012 18:09, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I also notice that the separate-checkpointer patch failed to rename
>> assorted things like BgWriterCommLock, BgWriterRequest,
>> BgWriterShmemStruct, which are all 100% inappropriately named now.
>> And it still contains various obsolete comments referring to itself
>> as the background writer. Will see about cleaning that up.
> For want of a better name, keeping them the same seemed best.
I was just thinking s/BgWriter/Checkpointer/, do you think that's too
long?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-05-07 18:51:04 | Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-05-07 18:27:19 | Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. |