Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A minor correction in comment in heaptuple.c
Date: 2014-01-25 21:53:39
Message-ID: 9702.1390686819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-01-25 16:28:09 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Is everyone OK with me applying this patch from Kevin, attached?

> No. I still think this is stupid. Not at all clearer and possibly breaks
> stuff.

I agree; this patch is flat out wrong. It converts a valid situation
which is correctly handled into an Assert trap, or probably a core dump
in a non-assert build.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-01-25 21:54:12 Re: A better way than tweaking NTUP_PER_BUCKET
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-01-25 21:50:35 Re: What is happening on buildfarm member crake?