Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Something along these lines would be OK with me (I haven't yet
> validated every detail), but there were previous objections to adding
> any new fields to log_line_prefix until we had a flexible CSV format.
> I think that's raising the bar a bit too high, personally, but I don't
> have the only vote around here...
I think I was the one objecting. I don't necessarily say that we have
to have a "flexible" CSV format, but I do say that facilities that are
available in log_line_prefix and not in CSV logs are a bad thing.
regards, tom lane