Re: Range types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Range types
Date: 2009-12-16 20:26:23
Message-ID: 9470.1260995183@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> In short, I think that while it is possible to define ranges of strings,
> it is not as useful as one would like.

Note it is not the *range* that is the problem, it is the assumption
that there's a unique "next" string. There's no unique next in the
reals or rationals either, but we have no problem considering intervals
over those sets.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-12-16 20:27:13 Re: Update on true serializable techniques in MVCC
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-12-16 20:26:22 Re: Update on true serializable techniques in MVCC