Re: sepgsql contrib module

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sepgsql contrib module
Date: 2011-01-21 14:55:48
Message-ID: 9431.1295621748@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> For that matter, I wonder what happens with regular function
> permissions. If the plan inlines the function and then somebody goes
> and changes the permission on the function and makes it SECURITY
> DEFINER, what happens?

ALTER FUNCTION is supposed to cause plan invalidation in such a case.
Not sure if GRANT plays nice with that though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2011-01-21 14:58:59 Re: SSI and Hot Standby
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-21 14:51:26 Re: More detailed auth info