| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 |
| Date: | 2018-12-08 06:09:18 |
| Message-ID: | 93a3d2fb-43a0-cf14-e8d0-d2c3195c1e5b@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/12/2018 17:40, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> I perform some tests and think behavior with partition tables is slightly inconsistent.
>
> postgres=# reindex table measurement;
> WARNING: REINDEX of partitioned tables is not yet implemented, skipping "measurement"
> NOTICE: table "measurement" has no indexes
> REINDEX
> postgres=# reindex table CONCURRENTLY measurement;
> ERROR: cannot reindex concurrently this type of relation
>
> Maybe we need report warning and skip partitioned tables similar to plain reindex?
OK, that should be easy to fix.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-12-08 06:16:42 | Re: make install getting slower |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-12-08 04:33:32 | Re: pg_partition_tree crashes for a non-defined relation |