Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, John Naylor <jcnaylor(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experimental patch: generating BKI revisited
Date: 2009-11-13 16:00:07
Message-ID: 937d27e10911130800t61f335c5x1742d0f082bd1781@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> I had a look at this some time ago and I must admit that I find it
>> pretty interesting.  The technology choices make it
>> obviously impossible to merge -- not only the particular Perl modules
>> used, but the mere fact that Perl is used (and that such a recent
>> version is required).  But you're already aware of all this so I'm not
>> going to say more.
>
> Really?  Perl is a show-stopper?  That seems harsh.  Perl is pretty
> ubiquitous - in fact, given that we now support Windows, arguably more
> so than awk.

Building in VC++ on Windows already requires Perl. And if you're
building in mingw, you've probably already got it, or can get it
pretty easily.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-11-13 16:08:25 Re: Listen / Notify rewrite
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-11-13 15:55:27 Re: next CommitFest