| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Client application name |
| Date: | 2009-10-21 15:47:22 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10910210847k14baab3amc5e28cd7cf857fd2@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> This might be a good argument for changing that going forward, but
>> it will be *years* before we can rely on it for anything.
>
> That's what I meant by 'a few releases' (major, not minor).
BTW, any thoughts on Heikki's suggestions of hacking about the
'options' value or retrying the connection vs. just doing a SET
post-connection in libpq? It's pretty certain that whatever I choose
you probably won't like :-p
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-10-21 16:12:16 | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-10-21 15:42:17 | Re: URL Managment - C Function help |