Re: Application name patch - v2

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Date: 2009-10-19 09:03:32
Message-ID: 937d27e10910190203h64cb46fdycdfc9e99f7ce70f8@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> There are some log parser's and analysers. So people use reduced log
> often. The reductions rules should be based on application name. Why
> not? And when somebody modifies to appliacation name, then these logs
> finish in '/dev/null.

So if your insecure app worries you, just don't use %a in the log
prefix, or ignore the column in the CSV logs.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-10-19 09:12:34 Re: Application name patch - v2
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-10-19 09:01:42 Re: Application name patch - v2