Re: Application name patch - v2

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v2
Date: 2009-10-19 08:08:01
Message-ID: 937d27e10910190108t26cc1aednec274370052bb91c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I dislike write access to app name guc for user too. It's not safe.
> Maybe only super user can do it?

That'll render it pretty useless, as most applications wouldn't then
be able to set/reset it when it makes sense to do so.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2009-10-19 08:10:48 Re: Application name patch - v2
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-10-19 07:54:38 Re: Application name patch - v2