From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
Date: | 2009-01-27 16:45:29 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10901270845y220c982bycbcd118b8d187831@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2009 17:47:52 Dave Page wrote:
>> The primary case that I'm objecting to is HS which you've
>> been saying will take 10 - 12 months to complete having by your own
>> admission not looked at the code or followed the discussion
>> particularly closely.
>
> Is there another committer or expert with a different ETA estimate?
>
Heikki, who has been in-depth reviewing the patch for some time,
quoted a figure of 2 weeks for the known issues.
AFAIK, he has not revised that estimate since.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-27 16:46:51 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-01-27 16:42:48 | Re: 8.4 release planning (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules) |