| From: | "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Hans-Juergen Schoenig" <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint |
| Date: | 2007-11-02 17:03:16 |
| Message-ID: | 9362e74e0711021003k293bd7e7jec447d33c11efc86@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/2/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > The feature i am talking about is very simple and it won't even add
> > 100 lines of code into the Postgres source code base.
>
> [ splorfff... ] The grammar support alone will cost ten times that.
>
> You should probably reflect on the fact that not one single person
> besides you thinks this is a good idea.
>
> regards, tom lane
Tom,
If you have made this comment, when i requested for the comment, i
would have dropped this idea there itself. :). But please let me know your
comments on why you feel this is useless.
But i guess(I may be wrong), you may be wrong about the grammar support
part.
--
Thanks,
Gokul.
CertoSQL Project,
Allied Solution Group.
(www.alliedgroups.com)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-11-02 17:04:20 | Re: Clarification about HOT |
| Previous Message | Gokulakannan Somasundaram | 2007-11-02 16:57:27 | Re: Clarification about HOT |