Re: additional json functionality

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: additional json functionality
Date: 2013-11-18 01:51:56
Message-ID: 914EAB9F-DC9C-4AF9-A406-98EE66BC7A7F@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Nov 17, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> Jstore isn't the worst name suggestion I've heard on this thread. The
> reason I prefer JSONB though, is that a new user looking for a place to
> put JSON data will clearly realize that JSON and JSONB are alternatives
> and related in some way. They won't necessarily expect that "jstore"
> has anything to do with JSON, especially when there is another type
> called "JSON". Quite a few people are liable to think it's something to
> do with Java.
>
> Besides, we might get sued by these people: http://www.jstor.org/ ;-)

Okay, how about JDATE? ;-P

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Flower 2013-11-18 01:58:09 Re: additional json functionality
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-11-18 01:49:18 Re: additional json functionality