| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Dumping an Extension's Script |
| Date: | 2012-12-05 18:07:35 |
| Message-ID: | 9074.1354730855@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> And whether extension control files (or the same information stored in a
> table or wherever) should be per-database or per cluster - that's *yet*
> another separate issue. You could argue for either behavior.
I think anyone arguing for the former is confusing an installed
extension with a not-installed one. Maybe it would help if we adopted
different terminologies. Perhaps call the control+sql files a "template",
while using "extension" for the installed entity?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-05 18:11:51 | Re: ALTER TABLE ... NOREWRITE option |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-05 18:05:10 | Re: Slow query: bitmap scan troubles |