Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING
Date: 2009-10-04 17:35:43
Message-ID: 8F28E816-E2B0-4629-994E-1633187DA01B@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Oct 4, 2009, at 1:24 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 01:16:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Marko Tiikkaja <marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi> writes:
>>> If I understood you correctly, this would imply that you wouldn't
>>> be able to do for example:
>>
>>> INSERT INTO foo
>>> WITH t AS ( DELETE FROM bar RETURNING * )
>>> SELECT * FROM t;
>>
>> Um ... forget what I said --- not enough caffeine yet, apparently.
>>
>> Yeah, rewrite rules are going to be a *serious* stumbling block to
>> this whole concept.
>
>> Maybe we should just punt the project until we have a clear idea of
>> how to do that.

This was discussed a bit upthread and doesn't seem obviously
unmanageable to me.

> Maybe rewrite rules just don't fit with this feature, and should cause
> an error. We have other things that don't work together, and the
> world hasn't ended yet.

That doesn't seem very satisfactory.

...Robert
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-10-04 17:43:18 Re: COPY enhancements
Previous Message David Fetter 2009-10-04 17:24:39 Re: Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING