| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Per-column collation |
| Date: | 2010-12-06 19:36:30 |
| Message-ID: | 8CB282F1-6F2D-4E42-8F26-20BCC96A925C@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 6, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> This has been touch upon several times during the discussions on past
> patches.
>
> Essentially, the current patch only arranges that you can specify a sort
> order for data. The system always breaks ties using a binary
> comparison. This could conceivably be changed, but it's a separate
> problem. Some of the necessary investigation work has presumably
> already been done in the context of citext.
Okay, thanks, good to know.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-12-06 19:38:22 | Re: Label switcher function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-06 19:36:04 | Re: pg_execute_from_file review |